Case study Pedophile Housing Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

Case study Pedophile Housing - look Paper ExampleHowever, some argue that the offenders courtly liberties are being violated in conjugation with these laws.In regard to Ms. Abacas decision to change the current legislation she must consider the different types of offenders. The national government requires the federal registration of all internal offenders to register under the Sex Offender accommodation and Notification Act. However, familiar offenders toilet be further classified by their crimes. All sexual offenders go committed a violation of the victims privacy. However, this violation canister differ based upon categorisation. Presently differentiations divide sexual crimes into two categories. According to the United States Department of Justice (2008), (i) any type or degree of genital, ad-lib or anal penetration , or (ii) any sexual touching of or contact with a persons body either directly or through clothing (6). However, there are strong differentiations amid the two categories.Penetration of the victims body is a serious violation of both the victims civil liberties and personal space. In comparison category two as defined by the federal government is a unsubtle category. These differentiations raise ethical questions if offenders that do not penetrate the victim should be required to register with both the federal and state sex offender registries as this maybe construed as a violation of the offenders civil liberties.The age of the victim plays an important role in sentencing the offender. Aggravated factors include imprisonment, kidnapping, making videos, prostitution of minors, self-denial/distribution of child pornography and any type of sexual violations that involve a minor. shortly sexual offenders cannot live within a specific distance of prepares, churches, daycare centers, park and community centers. In legitimate states sexual offenders are not allowed to cast within a specific mileage of these places. However, one can a rgue that this is not just to have broad rules and restrictions placed upon all offenders. Sexual offenders that do not have aggravated circumstances (which include the involvement of a minor) are classified into the broad classification of rules applied to sexual offenders. Like other offenders these offenders that have not committed sexual offenses against minors and do not have aggravated circumstances are not able to reside or work within a certain distance of places that involve children. These circumstances are unjust to these offenders as these limitations do not allow for the offender to pursue life in many different aspects. To further embroil the differentiations among sexual offenders, individuals over the age of 18 can be prosecuted for having sexual interactions with individuals fewer than 18. Although, this may out to be a valid and important point there are instances in which this categorization can be unethical. For example, is it ethical to prosecute an 18 year ol d senior in high school that has had sexual interactions with his sixteen year old sophomore girlfriend In these cases, should the individual be forced to register as a sex offender for the rest of his life Instead of focusing on ethics these cases often slip through the system and are meant to be exemplary. According to Students Against Destructive Decisions (2007), Currently 46.8% of all high school students report they have had sexual intercourse. With regard to these statistics one must admiration if it is fair to punish as eighteen year old senior that is having sexual